![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:18 • Filed to: Show Us, OppositeLock | ![]() | ![]() |
A new model year always brings with it the risk of transforming the predecessor into an embarrassment, as is the goal for the designers, but occasionally the aged chassis can still hold its own in the used marketplace and possibly steal new car sales away from its replacement.
With all the dazzle the new !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! has brought, the old C6 Z06 is still no automotive powerhouse to scoff at, keeping with it a classic manual transmission and a low price tag.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
What other models were not shamed by their replacements?
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:19 |
|
No one can say for sure until sales numbers come out....
That is the real measure of success, not some abject enthusiasts' dream
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:19 |
|
its*
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:20 |
|
its replacement had good intentions, but this was just ultra epic.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:20 |
|
K. I got one.
THIS AIN'T SUCCEEDING NO F40.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:20 |
|
acura integra getting replaced by the acura rsx
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:21 |
|
The Mustang II.
It was so bad it made the previous version look amazing.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:22 |
|
The 2011 Honda Civic
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:22 |
|
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:23 |
|
Porsche 944 Turbo > 968
Porsche 993 > 996
BMW 135is > M235i
BMW Z4 M > Z4 sDrive35i
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:25 |
|
The way the question is phrased is confusing. If you mean ashamed of its replacement, then:
The E46 M3
I still find it to be superior in almost all areas besides power to the E90. I kept a E46 M3 for 10 years and miss it dearly. I had a E90 M3 for a less than a year and didn't give a second thought to trading it on a C63.
If you mean shamed (spanked/supplanted/etc) by it's replacement, the new M3/4 is mopping the floor with the E90 in all the ways I care about.
...Basically I'm saying I don't like the E90 M3 compared to its predecessor and successor.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:25 |
|
Porsche 993.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:28 |
|
And the answer is...
...Miata.
As good as the current one is, and it's really good, the first two were the best.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:28 |
|
1st/2nd Gen Eclipse (or Talon)....now hold your horses before you flame me. But this was the pinnacle of the Eclipse's era. And nothing will replace a 1G/2G Eclipse in my list of cars I'd like to hoon.
AWD + Turbo + Manuel = Fun in a bun
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:31 |
|
Edit: I am a dumbass
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:33 |
|
I read it like 5 times before I got it too x-x Initially I posted the 991 Targa because it looks way better than the old Targas. :D
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:35 |
|
WORDS:
What do they mean?!
I feel stupid.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:35 |
|
This x1,000,000
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:35 |
|
Basically any successor to a car from the 1960s in the 1970s
Of course even these cars have their own hidden surprises!
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:38 |
|
AGREE!
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:38 |
|
I would say the Protegé5, which was replaced by the mazda3 hatch.
The protegé5 was fun to drive, felt sporty, loved corners and had a sporty look.
The mazda3 felt bigger/slower/heavier....
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:38 |
|
Ohhh this might be a winner.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:42 |
|
True. I have both and I feel quicker in the E46. I am more confident driving fast through the twisties in the E46. Both my cars are stock and I think the stock setup in the E46 coupe is better than the stock setup in the E92 coupe or E90 sedan. That being said the E9X seems to benefit more from after market mods than the E46 did. We have some cool opponauts who have improved their E9X cars and track them with great success.
I am selling my E46 M3 not because I don't love it, but because the E90 is my only 4 door car. It can really come in handy to have a 4 door car sometimes... I wish there had been a sedan version of the E46 like there was the E36
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:42 |
|
Agree to disagree. The S65 engine is flawless. My previous car had an N54. Turbos are for the birds. The only thing they're good for on a track car is creating a whole lot of heat.
And the M3/4? I'll never own a sports car with a feature called "lane departure warning." If we let the Germans tell us what's best, we'll end up like the GT3 - two pedals only. Although that doesn't bother a Mercedes driver, I guess =)
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:42 |
|
Why don't you like the M235i?
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:46 |
|
03-04 Mustang Cobra.
Once again the pinnacle of an era for a lot of people. Sure the new 2013 GT500s are faster, but they're also heavier, more expensive, and lack the true race car heritage that the Cobras do.
For most Mustang enthusiasts, the 03-04 Cobra will always be the biggest step in Mustang history. Possibly only bested by the 2000 Cobra R.
*obligatory picture of my own :D*
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:52 |
|
On further reflection, it might be that I like the M156 so much more than the S65 that it is contributing to my tainted view of the E90. Nothing from Audi or AMG could match the E46 at the time, whereas the RS4 and C63 were legitimate competition for the E90.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 16:54 |
|
damn that hurts
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:04 |
|
I wouldn't call it bad.
It was smaller and lighter than the outgoing '73, it was fuel efficient in a time where it was sorely wanted, and they didn't look too bad considering the sudden law changes regarding bumpers (and the competition at the time).
That being said, it hasn't aged well.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:05 |
|
2700 pounds of curvaceous, turbocharged goodness-
Replaced with this convertible redheaded stepchild with just over 100hp.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:05 |
|
As an owner of a P5, I completely agree.
I can't even think of anything else that acts as eager to respond to your inputs.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:06 |
|
No newer Continental is as classy.
Also, the next one went back to body-on-frame compared to this one's unibody.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:07 |
|
Oh, it's still a good car, I just don't think it improves over the 135is other than it looks less smushed and offers more gizmos (if such things appeal to you). I'm biased because I have a 135is.
Compared to my car, the M235i is:
Slightly heavier
ZF 8-speed instead of 7-speed DCT
Not-as-good steering from the F30 3-series
Stuck with iDrive even if you don't want navigation
Makes fake engine noises where the 135is has the M Performance Exhaust and real engine noises
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:10 |
|
Lulz. I didn't even think of the poor little MR2. What a shame...
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:10 |
|
Oh I forgot your car has the DCT!
And I forgot about the electric power steering. I hate that crap.
I didn't know the M235i was going to have fake engine noises. It should have a real exhaust instead!
I do really dig the M235i looks. But your car probably is more fun to drive.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:11 |
|
Makes me laugh when I see what people try to sell the MK3 for compared to what I paid for my MK2 turbo. What could have been.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:12 |
|
That's a very accurate observation. Having competition in this segment is fantastic for the enthusiast. If I only needed to use the car as a daily driver, I think I'd find it almost impossible to choose between the E90 M3, RS4 and C63. I might actually pick the Audi.
As it is, though, I needed a car that was just as capable on the track and I'm sorry to say that only one of the above really fits that description. I've been on track with multiple C63s (though I've never driven one myself) and, while I absolutely love hearing the exhaust, it's just not a "track car" by any stretch.
Regardless of our quips from generation to generation, I don't think there will really ever be any M3 (or 4, I guess) that will be "shamed" by its replacement. If we don't think the US spec E36 fits into that category (and I really don't think it does), the other cars are probably safe as well. Each generation tends to be a pretty radical departure from the previous, and they all have their charms. As much as I love the E90, I still admire the E46 and would be proud to own one...
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:14 |
|
I'm assuming fake engine noises because the M135i has them. BMW calls it a Sound Symposer.
http://www.worldcarfans.com/113010752307/b…
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:16 |
|
If they would've stopped trying to make it a compact city car and instead learned that a big majority of them were being bought by enthusiasts, then they might have went a different route. But Toyota does kind of suck at keeping a sports car model around for very long, so its to be expected.
I'd love to see a modern-day MR2. Give it the same specs as the old turbo 2nd gen, but with a newer body and people would be all over it.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:17 |
|
I hate that crap...
I don't mind Ford's "sound tube" so much since it's real engine noise being piped in from the engine bay to the cabin.
But that Sound Symposer stuff is total nonsense.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:18 |
|
if the F40 had just had the sound of the F50
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:27 |
|
Shhhhhhhhhh let us think we matter
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:27 |
|
I'd want a little more power, more like 300/300. The FRS almost makes what the 2.0T did as a NA 2.0, so new tech would easily support more power.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:39 |
|
Weren't they somewhere in the 220hp range? Or is that way off?
I think 260-300 would be pretty do-able, but in such a small and lightweight package they'd be killing teenagers left and right lol.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:54 |
|
According to the majority of OPPO (/the whole internet?): the 2014 WRX.
Personally, the restyling of the 2015 MY WRX makes me more apt to get one because it looks less like a wannabe Fast and Furious-mobile.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:56 |
|
sorry I couldn't resist
2200 lbs of angular 80's, space wedge, naturally aspirated goodness
replaced with this big heavy Ferrari wannabe
=) just kidding (kinda) I love all MR2's
![]() 01/16/2014 at 17:58 |
|
No need to apologize, I really like the MK1 as well. 500 pounds gained on the MK2, but a great bump in power and quality.
![]() 01/16/2014 at 18:36 |
|
It's ok to dream but delusion is bad
![]() 01/16/2014 at 22:46 |
|
In keeping with the theme of the title picture, the C2 Corvette was not shamed by its replacement:
The C3 was the same chassis with a new body and interior, and those are just different rather than better. What the C3 did to better was emissions, but that came at a very high cost in terms of power.
![]() 01/18/2014 at 11:36 |
|
YES!
Reigntastic is right though - at least they did even it out with the added power.
The 3rd gen went the opposite direction - significant weight loss, but also a significant power loss. I bet it's still quick and insanely fun, but it is a good answer for this question. Kind of a let down - especially when it became it convertible-only (in the US) :/
![]() 01/18/2014 at 11:39 |
|
The NC's are too bloated imo.
The NB's are arguably the best Miatas ever. It's true that they lack the character-boosting popup headlights, but otherwise they literally took everything good from the NA and made it better.
![]() 01/24/2014 at 22:35 |
|
I read this wrong! I thought you meant a successor not bringing shame to the brand :D Anyways:
![]() 01/25/2014 at 12:54 |
|
I think what he is getting at is that ever model, and ever some mid model changes year of the Miata has gotten heavier, larger, comfier. Less Miatay
I just hope the next Miata doesn't look like this. This design is just way to BMW, way to sharp, way not cute enough to be a Miata lol.
![]() 01/25/2014 at 12:55 |
|
I like the 99-04 Mustang simply b/c the are so much smaller than the 05-up Stangs
![]() 01/25/2014 at 12:58 |
|
I love the RSX Type S. I just don't get why they ditch the Integra name on our shores. The RSX type-S should have been the Interga GSR. I loved my GSR and although I've never driven an RSX, I plan on getting a Type-S b/c finding a clean stock GSR is impossible.
![]() 01/25/2014 at 13:46 |
|
ha, I do see a bit of Z4 in it now that you mention it.
It looks nice, but I can see what you mean. It does have a few too many sharp edges and doesn't necessarily scream Miata.
But at the same time, I can definitely see Mazda going this direction with the Miata.
If they can drop the weight considerably - which I believe they were talking about - then we'll be all good. I think they were also saying about having an optional low-end 1.5L motor which is a whole lotta bleh, but most importantly, they gotta keep the weight down. It'd be nice if they could trim down the body to make it less chunky than the NC, but I don't really see Mazda making it any smaller :/